Massachusetts Anti-Casino Ballot Question Gets Nixed by State AG
A citizens’ anti-gambling initiative has been shot down by the State’s Attorney General
While the state of Massachusetts is gearing up for rapid expansion of gambling in the state, not everybody has been excited about the move. That’s why some anti-gambling activists there have actually created a petition in an attempt to force a statewide vote on set up casino jobs could be able to move ahead.
People who are against the casinos that are new indian dreaming slot big win able to gather sufficient signatures to send the ballot question forward to the attorney general’s office. But unfortuitously for them, the state solicitor however a stop to your move, saying that the ballot concern wouldn’t be legal beneath the state’s ballot initiative process.
Constitutional Provisions Preclude Ballot Question
Underneath the present state Constitution, the ballot initiative procedure is included in Article 48. That article not just outlines the process for getting a relevant question in the ballot, but also establishes what can and can’t be included in such questions. One of the rules for proposals claims that they cannot affect an entity’s ‘right to get compensation for private property appropriated to public use’.
In accordance with state solicitor Peter Sacks, if the relevant question were to be approved by the public, thus closing the casino deals immediately, it might take the casino developers’ contract rights away without any settlement. It would additionally ‘impair the contracts that are implied between the Massachusetts Gaming Commission and those developers, who have previously paid millions in application fees towards the state.